Return to "A Phone Number for the President" Main Page ||| Previous Document ||| Next Document

Heading Text



From: San.Francisco <>
Subject: RE: Request response to our conversation on August 22, 2011
Date: November 23, 2011 1:10:41 PM PST
To: Mike Knell <>

Mr. Knell,

Thank you for your email. it sounds like this is a somewhat complicated situation. As such, I think the best course of action is for you to come down to the FBI offices here in the city (450 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102) and speak with the complaint duty agent. If you can do that, bring whatever documentation you can provide to substantiate these claims and we can see if it is something a criminal squad (in this case probably a public corruption squad) would be interested in. If they feel it warrants further investigation, they could discuss working with you in your dealings with the CPUC. Unfortunately, without all of the facts and documentation, I can't make that determination myself. So if you are available to come down to the offices here, we are here from 8:00-5:00 M-F, and will be closed tomorrow for Thanksgiving. Thanks and good luck!

FBI Duty Agent
San Francisco

From: Mike Knell []
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 12:50 PM
To: San.Francisco
Subject: Fwd: Request response to our conversation on August 22, 2011

To the FBI,

I have documents which can be used to prove AT&T lied to the California Public Utilities Commission to conceal problems in its underground infrastructure.

I also have evidence of corruption at the CPUC, in which CPUC Officials have helped Utilities conceal problems in its underground infrastructure. Some of these documents can be linked to the San Bruno fire, which killed eight people.

I believe that the Executive Director of the CPUC (Paul Clanon) is trying to set up a back room deal to get AT&T to settle with me, rather than acknowledge that AT&T committed criminal acts in the underground infrastructure.

The documents can be used to save the jobs of thousands of State employees who will lose their jobs due to the State Budget deficit.

In the emails below, you can see that I have spoken to the Executive Director on August 22, 2011 regarding some issues linked to concealing problems in the underground infrastructure. Instead of answering the questions, Mr. Clanon is requesting that I meet with him.

I am truly fearful of meeting with Mr. Clanon at the CPUC, because last year, after I requested to meet with him, the State Police showed up at my front door.
During the conversation I had with Mr. Clanon on August 22, 2011, I asked if he was involved in sending the State Police to my house, and he refused to answer the question.

Is there any way the FBI can work with me, and have an agent come with me to the CPUC?

Thank You

Mike Knell

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Madrigal, Anna-Marie" <>
Date: November 22, 2011 6:00:43 PM PST
To: "Mike Knell" <>
Cc: <>
Subject: RE: Request response to our conversation on August 22, 2011

Thank you, Mr. Knell, for your request. Paul is able to meet with you here at our San Francisco office regarding your concerns.
His available times are:

M, Jan 2, 10-1030 or 130-200pm
T, Jan 3, 10-1030 or 130-200pm
W, Jan 4 10-1030 or 130-200pm

Please let me kow what day & time work best and I will schedule on Paul's calendar.

Thank you,
Anna-Marie Madrigal
Executive Director's Office
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102
O: 415.703.1636
F: 415.703.1356

From: Mike Knell []
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:31 PM
To: Clanon, Paul
Cc: Brown, Carol A.;; Madrigal, Anna-Marie
Subject: Request response to our conversation on August 22, 2011

Mr. Clanon,

As noted in the email from Carol Brown (below), we spoke on August 22, 2011, about some issues related to AT&T.

In our conversation, I asked you to investigate if AT&T lied to the CPUC in a Formal Complaint about a phone number in a document I photographed. The phone number received service from a phone line that was known to be defective.
I claim the phone number is mine (925-462-5093), and AT&T claimed the phone number had the last five digits of "85093."

Have you made a determination about whether the phone number has the last five digits of "25093" as I claim, or "85093" as AT&T claimed?

I also asked you to investigate if AT&T had lied to the CPUC regarding the meaning of the trouble code "98." I was told that the trouble code "98" is an indication of multiple troubles by Don McCarty. In the Formal Complaint, AT&T told the CPUC the trouble code "98" was not an indication of trouble.

Have you made a determination about whether the trouble code "98" is an indication of trouble on the phone lines?

I look forward to your response. If your response is what I hope it to be, I look forward to showing you how to prevent the problems I experienced, from happening to others.

Thank You
Mike Knell



On Aug 22, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Brown, Carol A. wrote:

Hello Mr. Knell:
President Peevey has been informed by Executive Director Clanon that you and Mr. Clanon are working/communicating now on your issues and President Peevey is confident that this is the best avenue for you to pursue at this time. Executive Director Clanon will keep President Peevey and the rest of the commissioners up to date on your issues and any progress made.

Thank you,

Carol Brown













more body text.


go back to the top

Questions and Comments to JTR Publishing. (

You are welcome to visit my business website, JTR Publishing, for V-8 engine swap manuals and parts